Example This is what you'll get after entering a topic

Your Coach's Game Plan

Get guidance on what to write. Then write your post in your own voice.

1. Enter topic 2. Choose approach 3. Get your plan

Example Topic

"Why most productivity advice doesn't work"

Curiosity Gap - Create an information gap that demands to be filled

Key takeaway

Most productivity advice fails because it privileges tools over attention and context; readers should feel curious about concrete changes that produced 80/20 results.

Hook

Open with a bold claim that most productivity advice is broken, then follow with an incomplete surprising fact (e.g., a number of tips tried) and the line "But that's not the interesting part" to create a curiosity gap.

Main points

Describe a short experiment: state how many productivity tips or tools you tried and over what period, then say that the raw count wasn't the useful result.

Details: Reference "25 productivity tips" tested over "12 weeks"

Explain why most advice fails by naming specific terms: call out Pomodoro, GTD, task lists, calendar overload, notifications, and context switching.

Details: Use "Pomodoro 25-minute cycle", "GTD task list", "context switching"

Share the 3 concrete adjustments you kept: limit daily tasks, protect long focus blocks, and simplify tools.

Details: State "3 MITs per day", "two 90-minute focus blocks", "reduced notifications by 70%"

Closing

Close by naming the exact two habits you adopted and state the measurable timeframe when those changes produced results, without asking the reader a question.

Narrative Transportation - Tell a story that transports the reader

Key takeaway

Most productivity advice fails because it treats output as a function of tools instead of attention and context; readers should reframe productivity as attention management.

Hook

Open with a bold declarative claim that names a domain term and a number (e.g., "90% of productivity advice is broken because it ignores attention").

Main points

Describe a specific moment in time: timestamp, sensory detail, the concrete challenge, and the initial hypothesis you held.

Details: Use "2 AM", "calendar", "5 tasks", "unread emails", and "decision fatigue"

Explain the failure of a popular method by naming it and describing how it failed in your workflow.

Details: Reference "Pomodoro", "GTD", "Eisenhower matrix", or "Deep Work" with numbers like "25-minute" or "90-minute"

Share a concrete experiment you ran: steps, time window, metrics, and outcome numbers.

Details: Describe a "7-day" or "30-day" experiment, tracking "context switches" and "projects completed"

Closing

Close with a first-person commitment describing the next measurable step you will take for "30 days" and name the metric you will track.

Disorienting Dilemma - Challenge common assumptions

Key takeaway

Most productivity advice fails because it optimizes tools instead of attention and measurable deep work; readers should reconsider structure and metrics, not add another app.

Hook

Start with a disorienting dilemma: state a common belief (e.g., "Most people trust Pomodoro and apps") and immediately counter with a surprising counter-fact using a number or named term.

Main points

Explain why common tools fail: describe how apps, David Allen's GTD, and 25-minute Pomodoro cycles focus on task management rather than sustained attention.

Details: Reference "apps", "GTD", "David Allen", "25-minute Pomodoro", "decision fatigue", "context switching"

Share a short, concrete personal experiment: report the setup, duration, and raw results comparing Pomodoro+Trello vs scheduling deep work blocks.

Details: Use "14 days", "40 Pomodoro sessions", "Trello", "2 deep work blocks", "90 minutes"

Describe the metric shift that mattered: show how tracking "deep work minutes" revealed improvements that task counts hid.

Details: Mention "deep work minutes per day", baseline "30 minutes" rising to "150 minutes" over "7 days"

Closing

End by stating one concrete action you will take today (e.g., "I will block a 90-minute deep work session and log deep work minutes") and a brief declarative takeaway about measurement and structure.

More approaches available:

Identity Challenge

Challenge professional assumptions

Optimal Distinctiveness

Show how to stand out while fitting in

Cognitive Disfluency

Present familiar things in unexpected ways

Zeigarnik Effect

Start a story that creates tension

Your coach gives you the structure. You add your stories.

Pick an approach, write your post in your own voice, publish when ready.

Ready to write with a coach?

Get guided through your post. Write authentic content.

Start Writing with a Coach